What Ethnicity Have Dark Eyes And Dark Hair And Light Brown Skin

Advances in Anthropology
Vol.4 No.two(2014), Article ID:46104,eleven pages DOI:10.4236/aa.2014.42011

The Puzzle of European Hair, Eye, and Skin Color

Peter Frost

c/o Bernard Saladin d'Anglure, Anthropology Section, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada

E-mail: peter_frost61z@globetrotter.qc.ca

This work is licensed under the Artistic Commons Attribution International License (CC By).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received 22 January 2014; revised 23 February 2014; accepted 15 March 2014

ABSTRACT

Europeans, particularly northern and eastern Europeans, are unusually colored. Their pilus tin be not merely black but as well brownish, flaxen, gilded, or carmine, and their optics non but brown but also blue, greyness, hazel, or dark-green. Their pare is pale, almost like an albino'southward. This color scheme is more than developed in women than in men and seems to have been selected for its visual properties, particularly brightness and novelty. Sexual selection is a likely cause. Information technology favors eye-catching colors and, if strong enough, can produce a color polymorphism, i.eastward., whenever a visible characteristic becomes differently colored through mutation, the new colour will spread through the population until it loses its novelty value and becomes as frequent as the original ane. Such selection is consistent with 1) the many alleles for European pilus and middle color; 2) the high ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous variants; and 3) the relatively short time over which this color diversity developed. Sexual option will target women if they outnumber men on the mate market. Amidst early modernistic humans, such imbalances resulted from 1) a low polygyny rate (considering few men could provide for a second wife and her children) and 2) a high hazard of early male death (considering long hunting distances increased exposure to environmental hazards). Sexual option of women was stronger at latitudes farther from the equator, where men were less polygynous and more at risk of expiry while hunting. It was strongest on continental steppe-tundra, where men provided for virtually all family food needs by pursuing herds of reindeer and other herbivores over long distances. Although this blazon of surroundings is now fragmentary, it covered until 10,000 years ago a much larger territory—the same area where, today, hair and eyes are diversely colored and skin about milk white.

Keywords:Brightness, Eye Color, Hair Color, Novelty, Sexual Selection, Pare Colour

1. Introduction

Most humans have blackness hair, brownish eyes, and dark-brown skin. Europeans have a different color scheme, their hair beingness besides brownish, flaxen, gold, or red, and their optics too blueish, grayness, hazel, or light-green. Finally, their skin is pale, almost like an albino's.

How did this unusual color scheme come well-nigh? Perhaps the genetic alter that lightened the skin also afflicted the hair and the eyes. Yet the genes are different in each case. European pare lightened mainly through the appearance of new alleles at 3 genes: SLC45A2, SLC24A5, and TYRP1 (Beleza et al., 2013; Canfield et al., 2014; Soejima et al., 2005; Voight et al., 2006). European hair color diversified through a proliferation of new alleles at MC1R (Box et al., 1997; Flanagan et al., 2000; Makova & Norton, 2005; Rana et al., 1999). European middle colour diversified through a proliferation of new alleles in the HERC2-OCA2 region and elsewhere (Duffy et al., 2007; Eiberg et al., 2008; Kayser et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2010; Sturm & Frudakis, 2004; Sturm et al., 2008).

Low-cal skin is associated with a few of the new hair and eye color alleles, particularly the ones for red pilus or blue eyes. Conceivably, these alleles may be a side effect of selection for lighter skin (Duffy et al., 2004; Sturm & Frudakis, 2004). But why would such selection increase the total number of alleles for hair and eye color, especially when so many of them have little or no effect on skin color? And why have neither cherry-red hair nor blue eyes reached fixation in any human population, fifty-fifty those with milk-white complexions?

The European colour scheme has another puzzling aspect. It seems to result from a selection pressure that acted primarily on women and only secondarily on men:

- Hair colour varies more in women than in men. Redheads are peculiarly more frequent amid women (Shekar et al., 2008).

- Middle color varies more in women than in men when both copies of the and so-called blueish-eye allele are present, the effect being a greater diversity of female eye colors wherever blue eyes are the single most common phenotype, i.e., in northern and eastern Europe (Martinez-Cadenas et al., 2013).

- Blueish optics are associated in men with a more than feminine confront shape (Kleisner et al., 2010; Kleisner et al., 2013).

- In all human being populations, women are paler than men after puberty. This post-pubescent lightening is due to sexual maturation and non to differences in sun exposure (Edwards & Duntley, 1939; Edwards & Duntley, 1949; Edwards et al., 1941; van den Berghe & Frost, 1986). In women, lightness of skin correlates with thickness of subcutaneous fat and with 2nd to 4th digit ratio—a mark of prenatal estrogenization (Manning et al., 2004; Mazess, 1967). Admittedly, this sex activity difference is not greater in Europeans than in other populations, although it could not easily be otherwise, since Europeans are and so close to the physiological limit of depigmentation.

While women are more diverse than men both in hair and eye color, this greater multifariousness came virtually differently in each case. With hair color, women accept more of the intermediate hues because the darkest hue (black) is less easily expressed (Shekar et al., 2008). With center colour, women have more of the intermediate hues because the lightest hue (blue) is less easily expressed (Martinez-Cadenas et al., 2013).

In sum, European hair and centre colour diversified through a selection force per unit area that acted on different genes via unlike pigmentary changes. The mutual denominator seems to exist the creation of new visual stimuli on or nearly the face—the focus of visual attention.

2. Sexual Selection?

What type of choice pressure would brand a facial feature more colorful in one sexual activity than in the other? The likeliest type is sexual selection, which occurs when the mate market place has also many of one sex and too few of the other. The more than ane must compete for a mate, the more than 1 must vie for attention, and the more than success requires eye-catching qualities (Darwin, 1936: pp. 567-924; Emlen & Oring, 1977). This is the logic of advertising. "Visual merchandising" matters well-nigh in saturated markets that offer too many interesting choices among products of equal quality (Lea-Greenwood, 1998; Oakley, 1990).

One style to catch the middle is through bright or novel colors. Brightness keeps a color in memory longer, and novelty focuses attention on a color longer (Brockmole & Boot, 2009; Maan & Cummings, 2009). Significantly, perhaps, hair and eye colors are not only more diverse in Europe but as well brighter. Hair is carrot ruby but not beet red. Eyes are heaven blue just not navy blue.

Other ways to catch the eye include enlargement of secondary sexual characteristics and enhancement of facial features. The upshot is to "boost the signal" from visual features that are used either for sex identification or for communication and personal identification (Manning, 1972: pp. 47-49).

3. Frequency-Dependent Sexual Pick and Color Polymorphism

If strong plenty, sexual pick may create a color polymorphism. Whenever a visible feature becomes differently colored through mutation, the new color volition spread through the population until it loses its novelty value and becomes as frequent every bit the original one. The resulting equilibrium will last until some other color variant appears, and the total number of colors will thus grow over time. Such polymorphisms are known in a number of animal species, notably guppies, lizards, and various insects (Anderson, 1969; Brooks, 2002; Eakley & Houde, 2004; Endler, 1980; Farr, 1980; Grant et al., 1974; Hampton et al., 2009; Healey et al., 2008; Hughes et al., 1999; Hughes et al., 2005; Kokko et al., 2007; Muggleton, 1979; Olendorf et al., 2006; Simchuk, 2001; Sinnock, 1970).

Humans, besides, tend to prefer novel colors when choosing mates. In one study, men were shown pictures of bonny women and asked to choose the one they well-nigh wanted to ally. One series had equal numbers of brunettes and blondes, a 2nd series one brunette for every 5 blondes, and a 3rd 1 brunette for every eleven blondes. Information technology turned out that the scarcer the brunettes were in a series, the likelier any ane brunette would be called (Thelen, 1983). Another study likewise found that Proverb cover girls were much more ofttimes lite blonde or dark brown than the usual dark blonde or low-cal dark-brown of real life (Anon, 2008). This novelty result may be seen in sales of dwelling house interior colors over the past half-century: preference for 1 paint color rises until satiated, then falls and yields to preference for another (Stansfield & Whitfield, 2005).

Preference for novel colors, together with sufficiently strong sexual selection, may have acquired European hair and eye color to diversify. At the main pilus-color gene, MC1R, Europeans have 11 nonsynonymous alleles versus 5 for Asians and one for Africans (Harding et al., 2000). The actual disparity is even greater because the Asian alleles produce similar phenotypes. Europeans likewise have many alleles for centre colour inside the HERC2- OCA2 region (Liu et al., 2010). Contrary to widespread belief, brownish eyes are not truly ascendant and bluish eyes are not truly recessive. A single copy of the blue-eye allele normally produces an intermediate hue, like light-green or hazel, and even two copies volition not ever produce blue eyes (Branicki et al., 2009; Eiberg et al., 2008; Martinez-Cadenas et al., 2013).

These new hair and middle colors cannot be older than the arrival of modernistic humans in Europe around 40,000 years ago. Such a narrow timeframe argues for some kind of choice, rather than relaxation of choice and aggregating of not-adaptive mutations. The second scenario requires close to a million years to produce the current variability of hair and eye color, including approximately fourscore,000 years for today's prevalence of red pilus lone (Harding et al., 2000; Templeton, 2002).

4. Latitudinal Variation in the Intensity of Sexual Selection

If ancestral Europeans gained new hair and center colors through sexual selection, something must accept skewed the ratio of men to women on the mate market. Such an imbalance can ascend if the risk of early death differs past sex or if i sex tends to mate more often than the other one (Darwin, 1936: pp. 573-578; Emlen & Oring, 1977).

In most mammalian species, the males are the ones with more mates considering they tin return to the mate marketplace sooner afterwards impregnation. In contrast, the females are unavailable during pregnancy, lactation, and infant care. This pattern applies less to our species. Because humans take a longer infancy, the male is better able to increase his reproductive fitness by providing for his mate and her offspring. The more he becomes a provider, the more each act of mating will stop up costing him and the longer he volition stay off the mate marketplace.

In early human societies, i.east., hunter-gatherers and simple farming peoples, male provisioning varied with breadth. It was minimal in the tropics considering women could gather or grow food twelvemonth-round on their own. Polygyny was thus common, being limited not so much by a man'south capacity to exist a provider as past his ability to compete against rival males (van den Berghe, 1979: pp. 65-67).

Women were less self-reliant across the torrid zone. During winter, they could no longer get together or grow nutrient and depended on meat from their hunting spouses. This dependence increased with longer winters at higher latitudes (Hoffecker, 2002: p. viii; Kelly, 1995: pp. 262-270). Whereas women supplied twoscore% - 55% of all food consumed by hunter-gatherers beneath 40˚N, the proportion barbarous to less than 10% above lx˚Due north (Martin, 1974: pp. 16-xviii). At those latitudes, only a very able hunter could have a second wife (Kjellström, 1973: p. 118).

Higher latitudes meant non just fewer men on the mate marketplace merely also fewer men birthday. Considering women could not supply as much nutrient and because the land supported a lower density of wild animals, men had to hunt for longer periods and over longer distances, with the outcome that more of them died from falls, drowning, starvation, and common cold exposure (Burch Jr., 1972: pp. 339-368, 347, 349-350; Hoffecker, 2002: pp. eight-9; Kelly, 1995: pp. 128-132; Krupnik, 1985). Women thus faced a more than competitive mate market and stronger pressures of sexual selection. This was peculiarly and then on the continental steppe-tundra of the sub-Arctic, where well-nigh all food came from hunting of reindeer and other migratory game (Hoffecker, 2002: pp. seven-12; Schild, 1976).

Although continental steppe-tundra is now bars to parts of northeastern Siberia, Alaska, and the Canadian Chill, information technology was much more all-encompassing during the final ice age 25,000 to ten,000 years ago, when it formed a wide Eurasian zone that stretched across the plains of northern and eastern Europe and into northern Asia (meet Figure ane). This zone was continuously inhabited simply at its western cease. The climate was milder there because the Scandinavian icecap had pushed the steppe-tundra south of the 50˚North parallel and because the nearby Atlantic Bounding main provided warmth and moisture (Butzer, 1971: pp. 144, 463; Hoffecker, 2002: pp. three, 17). These conditions favored a lush growth of grasses, mosses, lichens, and low shrubs, which supported big herds of herbivores and, in turn, a big human population.

East of the Urals, this zone swung due north into colder, drier territory. The Asian steppe-tundra was not merely farther north merely likewise farther from the Atlantic'due south moderating influence. Its human population was thus smaller and prone to extinction over large areas, peculiarly during the glacial maximum (Goebel, 1999; Graf, 2009a; Graf, 2009b). This view is supported past analysis of Deoxyribonucleic acid retrieved from human being remains dated to 24,000 BP and 17,000 BP in s-central Siberia. Although the DNA shows strong affinities with present-day Europeans and Amerindians, the affinity is more than distant with present-day Siberians, who seem to be largely the product of repeopling from the s almost the end of the last water ice age (Maanasa et al., 2013).

The European steppe-tundra was thus a singularity among the many environments that modern humans entered while spreading out from Africa during the Paleolithic. Nutrient was abundant but accessible only to males of hunting age, whose ranks were continually thinned by hunting-related bloodshed. The resulting surplus of mateable females, combined with the high cost of polygyny, would have greatly intensified sexual option of women.

This region, essentially the plains of northern and eastern Europe, is today a singularity on the world map of human being physical variation. If we add Scandinavia, which was repeopled from these plains afterward the last ice age, we have the same region where the skin is whitest and the hair and eyes most diversely colored (Frost, 2006; Frost, 2008).

This geographic singularity stands out even more further back in time. Aboriginal Deoxyribonucleic acid from 2 Mesolithic hunter-gatherers, one from Grand duchy of luxembourg (8000 BP) and the other from Kingdom of spain (7000 BP), reveals that both had dark-brown pare even though they postdate the timeframe when European peel became white (Beleza et al., 2013; Canfield et al., 2014; Lazaridis et al., 2013; Olalde et al., 2014; encounter Tabular array ane). On the other mitt, both had non-brown optics (Lazaridis et al., 2013; Olalde et al., 2014). It seems that these European color traits evolved initially within function of Europe—the plains of the n and eastward—and only afterward spread outward to the residual of the continent and elsewhere, maybe through a succession of demographic expansions. It too seems that the changes to pilus, eye, and pare color were not simultaneous. Diversification of middle color preceded diversification of hair color and whitening of the peel.

Figure i. Eurasian steppe-tundra during the concluding water ice age (Ray & Adams, 2001).

Tabular array 1. Development of European colour traits.

5. Sexual practice Linkage?

If hairand middle-color variety is due to sexual selection of women, information technology should exist expressed more than in women than in men. At that place should be sex linkage. Initially, such pick would have acted on whatever alleles were available, these existence for the most office non sex-linked. Over time, there would have arisen new alleles that produce non-black hair and not-brown optics to a greater degree in women, and these alleles would have gradually replaced the older ones. This process would take admittedly been limited by the narrow timeframe of intense sexual selection, i.e., the terminal water ice age.

The new alleles show some sex linkage. Girls are lighter-haired than boys afterward puberty (Steggerda, 1941). During adulthood, blond hair darkens with historic period more slowly in women than in men (Olivier, 1960: p. 74). A twin study has confirmed that pilus is lighter in women than in men and that women prove greater variation in pilus color (Shekar et al., 2008). Finally, an unpublished digit ratio report indicates that prenatal exposure to estrogen is higher in individuals with non-black hair or not-chocolate-brown eyes (Mather et al., unpublished).

If prenatal estrogen mediates this sex activity linkage, ane outcome may be a more feminine face up shape if eyes are not brown. This was the unintended finding of two Czech studies where the participants were asked to rate male and female facial photos (Kleisner et al., 2010; Kleisner et al., 2013). The initial finding was that brown-eyed men were perceived as more than ascendant than blue-eyed men. When, equally a control, the chocolate-brown-eyed men were photoshopped to expect bluish-eyed, they were still rated as more than ascendant. Conscientious examination revealed that they had more masculine faces with broader and more massive chins, broader mouths, larger noses, larger eyebrows, and closer-set eyes. The blueish-eyed men had smaller and sharper chins, narrower mouths, smaller noses, and a greater altitude between the eyes.

Just the male person faces showed this human relationship between center color and confront shape, perhaps considering female confront shape is hormonally overdetermined, i.e., all girls are exposed to enough estrogen in the womb to feminize their faces, but just bluish-eyed boys reach this level of exposure. Could it be that centre colour correlated with face shape because some of the photos showed partly Jewish or Roma men with darker eyes and a different face up shape? If so, the brown-eyed men should have been more variable in face up shape, notwithstanding they were not. This explanation as well fails to explain why blueish eyes correlated with facial feminization in men simply not in women.

Nosotros encounter a like pattern with center color and shyness. In preschool boys, shyness is more than strongly associated with blue eyes than with brown eyes. This association is absent-minded in preschool girls (Coplan et al., 1998).

6. Other Physical Legacies of Stiff Sexual Selection

If intense sexual selection of women had created the palette of European hair and middle colors, it could have caused other physical characteristics to assume a specific colour or course. There may thus be other legacies of this episode of man development.

6.one. Whitening of the Skin

Ane legacy may be the extreme loss of peel pigment nosotros encounter in northern and eastern Europe—the aforementioned region where hair and center color have diversified. This whitening is ofttimes said to exist an adaptation to lower levels of solar UV at higher latitudes and nether cloudier skies. With less need for UV protection, the skin no longer had to be so nighttime. Alternatively, the skin lightened and so that more UV could pass through it for vitamin-D synthesis (Robins, 1991: pp. 187-212).

This kind of caption fails for two reasons. First, basis-level solar UV is every bit depression across Europe, northern Asia, and N America at latitudes above 47˚N (Jablonski & Chaplin, 2000: pp. 71, 76). Yet it is only in Europe that nosotros see extreme whitening of the skin. Second, co-ordinate to a study of the genes responsible, Europeans became white-skinned during the last ice age and long subsequently their ancestors had entered Europe some twoscore,000 years ago (Beleza et al., 2013; Canfield et al., 2014; Norton & Hammer, 2007; run into Table 1). "The implication is that our European ancestors were brownish-skinned for tens of thousands of years" (Gibbons, 2007). If white skin is an adaptation to lower levels of solar UV, bequeathed Europeans should accept begun to whiten once they had reached the more northerly and cloudier environments of Europe.

But if the crusade had been sexual selection, why did the peel become white instead of more diversely colored, like the hair and the eyes? It may be that men tended to choose lighter-skinned women from the offset because paleness is widely viewed as a female norm. In all man populations, women are the "fair sexual activity", their skin having less melanin and less peripheral blood menstruum. Male person peel is brown and ruby past comparison (Edwards & Duntley, 1939; Edwards & Duntley, 1949; Edwards et al., 1941; Frost, 1988; Frost, 2010; Manning et al., 2004; Mazess, 1967; van den Berghe & Frost, 1986). The homo mind thus seems predisposed to distinguish men from women by their skin coloring, fifty-fifty more than so than past their face shape, as shown past the power of subjects to tell whether a face up is male person or female even if the image is blurred and differs only in color (Tarr et al., 2001). The gender cues are hue and luminosity. Also having a less brown and less cherry-red complexion, women also display higher luminous contrast between their facial skin and their lips and eyes (Dupuis-Roy et al., 2009). This may exist why then many cultures have independently developed cosmetics to lighten facial pare while concealment the lips and the eye area (Russell, 2009; Russell, 2010). There is likewise a cross-cultural trend to see fairerskinned women as more feminine and to adopt them as mates, at to the lowest degree in traditional cultures (van den Berghe & Frost, 1986).

Thus, amid ancestral Europeans, and under weather of intense sexual selection, darker women would accept been disadvantaged on the mate market except when scarce plenty to do good from the novelty issue. Over fourth dimension, hateful skin color would have steadily lightened until sexual selection for lighter female pare had encountered equally strong natural choice for darker skin (to protect against solar UV) or a physiological limit to further loss of pigmentation.

If Europeans became white because of stronger sexual pick for lightness of female peel, one might expect them to show a larger sex difference in pare color. Actually, this sexual practice difference is largest in people with medium-colored skin (Frost, 2007; Madrigal & Kelly, 2006). In that location may be a ceiling effect in very low-cal-skinned people, i.e., female skin color cannot diverge as much from male skin color because both are already shut to the physiological limit of depigmentation.

half dozen.2. Face and Body Morphology

Another legacy may exist face shape. In Europeans, the face seems to accept assumed its present class through a selection pressure level that acted primarily on women (Liberton et al., 2009). Every bit with skin colour, selection for more feminine-looking women would have spilled over on to men as well, causing the population as a whole to take more feminine faces.

Finally, this intensification of sexual option may have afflicted secondary sexual characteristics that have long assumed dissimilar forms in men and women. In such cases, the existing sexual dimorphism should be enhanced. This may be why women of European descent have wider hips, narrower waists, and thicker subcutaneous fat than practice women of other origins (Choi & Trotter, 1970; Gasperino, 1996; Hrdlicka, 1898; Meredith & Spurgeon, 1980; Nelson & Nelson, 1986).

7. Conclusion

Sexual choice all-time explains the puzzle of European pilus, eye, and skin color. Within the same geographic range, and long afterwards modern humans had arrived in Europe, all three color traits changed greatly at an apparently fast rate. Although pilus color and eye color both underwent a similar diversification that produced similarly conspicuous hues, this process occurred at divide genes and in different means. The new hues were as well on or most the face, which is the focus of visual attending. Finally, this evolutionary change went farther in women than in men. Information technology seems, then, that the European color scheme was selected for its visual qualities in a context where women were the observed and men the observers.

Such a context is consistent with the European steppe-tundra of the last water ice age, where men were scarce on the mate market considering of the loftier price of polygyny and the high mortality due to long hunting distances. There was thus choice for visible female features that catch male person attention, either through brandish of bright or novel colors or through enhancement of existing sexual dimorphisms.

References

Anderson, West. Westward. (1969). Polymorphism Resulting from the Mating Reward of Rare Male person Genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 64, 190-197. http://dx.doi.org/x.1073/pnas.64.1.190
Anon (2008). Saying's Audition Prefers Brunettes; Distribution Is Bimodal. Factor Expression, July 6. http://world wide web.gnxp.com/blog/2008/07/maxims-audience-prefers-brunettes.php
Beleza, S., Murias dos Santos, A., McEvoy, B., Alves, I., Martinho, C., Cameron, E., Shriver, Grand. D., Parra, E. J., & Rocha, J. (2013). The Timing of Pigmentation Lightening in Europeans. Molecular Biological science and Evolution, 30, 24-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss207
Box, N. F., Wyeth, J. R., O'Gorman, L. Due east., Martin, N. G., & Sturm, R. A. (1997). Characterization of Melanocyte Stimulating Hormone Receptor Variant Alleles in Twins with Reddish Hair. Human Molecular Genetics, 6, 1891-1897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/vi.11.1891
Branicki, Due west., Brudnik, U., & Wojas-Pelc, A. (2009). Interactions betwixt HERC2, OCA2 and MC1R May Influence Homo Pigmentation Phenotype. Annals of Man Genetics, 73, 160-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.2009.00504.x
Brockmole, J. R., & Boot, W. R. (2009). Should I Stay or Should I Get? Attentional Disengagement from Visually Unique and Unexpected Items at Fixation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception, 35, 808-815.
Brooks, R. (2002).Variation in Female Mate Option within Guppy Populations: Population Divergence, Multiple Ornaments and the Maintenance of Polymorphism. Genetica, 116, 343-358. http://dx.doi.org/x.1023/A:1021228308636
Burch Jr., E. S. (1972). The Caribou/Wild Reindeer equally a Man Resource. American Antiquity, 37, 339-368. http://dx.doi.org/x.2307/278435
Butzer, One thousand. Westward. (1971). Environment and Archaeology. Aldine: Chicago.
Canfield, V. A., Berg, A., Peckins, Due south., Wentzel, S. G., Ang, K. C., Oppenheimer, S., & Cheng, K. C. (2014). Molecular Phylogeography of a Human Autosomal Skin Colour Locus under Natural Pick. G3, 3, 2059-2067.
Choi, S. C., & Trotter, Thousand. A. (1970). Statistical Study of the Multivariate Construction and Race-Sex Differences of American White and Negro Fetal Skeletons. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 33, 307-312. http://dx.doi.org/ten.1002/ajpa.1330330304
Coplan, R., Coleman, B., & Rubin, K. (1998). Shyness and Little Male child Blue: Iris Pigmentation, Gender, and Social Wariness in Preschoolers. Developmental Psychobiology, 32, 37-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(199801)32:i<37::AID-DEV4>3.0.CO;ii-U
Darwin, C. (1936 [1888]). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (second ed.). New York: Random House.
Duffy, D. 50., Box, N. F., Chen, W., Palmer, J. South., Montgomery, One thousand. W., James, M. R., Hayward, N. M., Martin, Northward. One thousand., & Sturm, R. A. (2004). Interactive Effects of MC1R and OCA2 on Melanoma Risk Phenotypes. Human Molecular Genetics, 13, 447-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddh043
Duffy, D. L., Montgomery, G. W., Chen, W., Zhao, Z. Z., Le, L., James, 1000. R., Hayward, N. Thousand., Martin, N. Thou., & Sturm, R. A. (2007). A Three-Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Haplotype in Intron ane of OCA2 Explains Well-nigh Human Eye-Colour Variation. American Journal of Human Genetics, 80, 241-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/510885
Dupuis-Roy, N., Fortin, I., Fiset, D., & Gosselin, F. (2009). Uncovering Gender Discrimination Cues in a Realistic Setting. Journal of Vision, 9, 10.1-10.8.
Eakley, A. 50., & Houde, A. E. (2004). Possible Role of Female Discrimination against "Redundant" Males in the Evolution of Colour Pattern Polymorphism in Guppies. Proceedings of the Majestic Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 271, S299-S301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0165
Edwards, E. A., & Duntley, Due south. Q. (1939). The Pigments and Colour of Living Human Skin. American Journal of Anatomy, 65, i-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000650102
Edwards, E. A., & Duntley, S. Q. (1949). Cutaneous Vascular Changes in Women in Reference to the Menstrual Cycle and Ovariectomy. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 57, 501-509.
Edwards, E. A., Hamilton, J. B., Duntley, S. Q., & Hubert, Chiliad. (1941). Cutaneous Vascular and Pigmentary Changes in Castrate and Eunuchoid Men. Endocrinology, 28, 119-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/endo-28-i-119
Eiberg, H., Troelsen, J., Nielsen, M., Mikkelsen, A., Mengel-From, J., Kjaer, Yard. West., & Hansen, L. (2008). Blue Eye Color in Humans May Be Caused by a Perfectly Associated Founder Mutation in a Regulatory Element Located within the HERC2 Gene Inhibiting OCA2 Expression. Man Genetics, 123, 177-187. http://dx.doi.org/ten.1007/s00439-007-0460-ten
Emlen, Southward. T., & Oring, 50. W. (1977). Ecology, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution of Mating Systems. Science, 197, 215- 223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.327542
Endler, J. A. (1980). Natural Selection on Colour Patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution, 34, 76-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2408316
Farr, J. A. (1980). Social Behavior Patterns equally Determinants of Reproductive Success in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Behaviour, 74, 38-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853980X00311
Flanagan, N., Healy, E., Ray, A., Philips, S., Todd, C., Jackson, I. J., Birch-Machin, 1000. A., & Rees, J. Fifty. (2000). Pleiotropic Effects of the Melanocortin one Receptor (MC1R) Factor on Human Pigmentation. Homo Molecular Genetics, ix, 2531-2537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/9.17.2531
Frost, P. (1988). Human Skin Color: A Possible Human relationship between Its Sexual Dimorphism and Its Social Perception. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 32, 38-58.
Frost, P. (2006). European Hair and Eye Color—A Case of Frequency-Dependent Sexual Selection? Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 85-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.002
Frost, P. (2007). Comment on Human Skin-Colour Sexual Dimorphism: A Exam of the Sexual Selection Hypothesis. American Journal of Concrete Anthropology, 133, 779-781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20555
Frost, P. (2008). Sexual Selection and Human Geographic Variation, Special Outcome: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the North-Eastern Evolutionary Psychology Society. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, ii, 169- 191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0099346
Frost, P. (2010). Femmes claires, hommes foncés. Les racines oubliées du colorisme (202 p). Quebec City: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.
Gasperino, J. (1996). Ethnic Differences in Body Limerick and Their Relation to Health and Illness in Women. Ethnicity & Health, 1, 337-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13557858.1996.9961803
Gibbons, A. (2007). American Association of Concrete Anthropologists Meeting: European Skin Turned Pale Only Recently, Gene Suggests. Science, 316, 364.
Goebel, T. (1999). Pleistocene Human Colonization of Siberia and Peopling of the Americas: An Ecological Approach. Evolutionary Anthropology, 8, 208-227. http://dx.doi.org/ten.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1999)eight:half-dozen<208::Assistance-EVAN2>three.0.CO;2-M
Graf, K. E. (2009a). "The Proficient, the Bad, and the Ugly": Evaluating the Radiocarbon Chronology of the Middle and Late Upper Paleolithic in the Enisei River Valley, S-Central Siberia. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 694-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2008.10.014
Graf, One thousand. E. (2009b). Modernistic Human Colonization of the Siberian Mammoth Steppe: A View from South-Central Siberia. In Yard. Camps, & P. Chauhan (Eds.), Sourcebook of Paleolithic Transitions (pp. 484-496). Berlin: Springer Science & Business concern Media. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76487-0_32
Grant, B., Snyder, A., & Glessner, S. F. (1974). Frequency-Dependent Mate Selection in Mormoniella vitripennis. Evolution, 28, 259-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2407327
Hampton, Thou. J., Hughes, K. A., & Houde, A. E. (2009). The Allure of the Distinctive: Reduced Sexual Responsiveness of Female Guppies to "Redundant" Male Colour Patterns. Ethology, 115, 475-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01634.x
Harding, R. 1000., Healy, Eastward., Ray, A. J., Ellis, North. Due south., Flanagan, N., Todd, C., Dixon, C., Sajantila, A., Jackson, I. J., BirchMachin, Chiliad. A., & Rees, J. Fifty. (2000). Evidence for Variable Selective Pressures at MC1R. American Journal of Human Genetics, 66, 1351-1361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/302863
Healey, G., Uller, T., & Olsson, M. (2008). Variety Is the Spice of Life: Female Lizards Choose to Associate with ColourPolymorphic Male Dyads. Ethology, 114, 231-237. http://dx.doi.org/x.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01469.x
Hoffecker, J. F. (2002). Desolate Landscapes. Ice-Age Settlement in Eastern Europe. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Hrdlicka, A. (1898). Concrete Differences betwixt White and Colored Children. American Anthropologist, 11, 347-350. http://dx.doi.org/x.1525/aa.1898.11.11.02a00020
Hughes, K. A., Du, L., Rodd, F. H., & Reznick, D. N. (1999). Familiarity Leads to Female Mate Preference for Novel Males in the Guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Animal Beliefs, 58, 907-916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1225
Hughes, One thousand. A., Rodd, F. H., & Reznick, D. Due north. (2005). Genetic and Environmental Furnishings on Secondary Sexual practice Traits in Guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Journal of Evolutionary Biological science, xviii, 35-45. http://dx.doi.org/x.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00806.10
Jablonski, Due north. K., & Chaplin, M. (2000). The Development of Human being Skin Coloration. Periodical of Homo Development, 39, 57-106 (p. 71, 76).
Kayser, M., Liu, F., Janssens, A. C. J. Due west., Rivadeneira, F., Lao, O., van Duijn, K., Vermeulen, M., Arp, P., Jhamai, M. 1000., van Ijcken, W. F. J., den Dunnen, J. T., Heath, S., Zelenika, D., Despriet, D. D. G., Klaver, C. C. W., Vingerling, J. R., de Jong, P. T. V. Chiliad., Hofman, A., Aulchenko, Y. S., Uitterlinden, A. Chiliad., Oostra, B. A., & van Duijn, C. M. (2008). Iii Genome-Wide Association Studies and a Linkage Assay Place HERC2 as a Human Iris Color Factor. American Periodical of Homo Genetics, 82, 411-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.ten.003
Kelly, R. L. (1995). The Foraging Spectrum. Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Kjellström, R. (1973). Eskimo Marriage. An Account of Traditional Eskimo Courtship and Marriage (p. 80). Lund: Nordiska Museets Handlingar.
Kleisner, K., Kocnar, T., Rubešova, A., & Flegr, J. (2010). Eye Color Predicts but Does Non Direct Influence Perceived Dominance in Men. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 59-64. http://dx.doi.org/ten.1016/j.paid.2010.03.011
Kleisner, Chiliad., Priplatova, L., Frost, P., & Flegr, J. (2013). Trustworthy-Looking Face Meets Brown Optics. PLoS ONE, viii, e53285. http://dx.doi.org/x.1371/journal.pone.0053285
Kokko, H., Jennions, M. D., & Houde, A. (2007). Evolution of Frequency-Dependent Mate Choice: Keeping Up with Way Trends. Proceedings of the Majestic Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 1317-1324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0043
Krupnik, I. I. (1985). The Male-Female Ratio in Sure Traditional Populations of the Siberian Arctic. Inuit Studies, 9, 115- 140.
Lazaridis, I., Patterson, N., Mittnik, A., Renaud, Chiliad., Mallick, S. et al. (2013). Aboriginal Human Genomes Suggest 3 Ancestral Populations for Nowadays-Day Europeans. BioRxiv, December 23. http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2013/12/23/001552.full-text.pdf+html
Lea-Greenwood, G. (1998). Visual Merchandising: A Neglected Area in UK Fashion Marketing? International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 26, 324-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09590559810231797
Liberton, D. 1000., Matthes, Yard. A., Pereira, R., Frudakis, T., Puts, D. A., & Shriver, M. D. (2009). Patterns of Correlation between Genetic Beginnings and Facial Features Suggest Option on Females Is Driving Differentiation, Abstract #668W. American Order of Homo Genetics, 59th Annual Meeting, Honolulu, 20-24 October 2009.
Liu, F., Wollstein, A., Hysi, P. 1000., Ankra-Badu, K. A., Spector, T. D., Park, D., Zhu, Thousand., Larsson, Thou., Duffy, D. L., Montgomery, G. W., Mackey, D. A., Walsh, South., Lao, O., Hofman, A., Rivadeneira, F., Vingerling, J. R., Uitterlinden, A. G., Martin, North. G., Hammond, C. J., & Kayser, M. (2010). Digital Quantification of Human Eye Color Highlights Genetic Association of 3 New Loci. PLoS Genetics, 6, e1000934. http://dx.doi.org/ten.1371/journal.pgen.1000934
Maan, M. Due east., & Cummings, Thou. E. (2009). Sexual Dimorphism and Directional Sexual Selection on Aposematic Signals in a Poisonous substance Frog. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United states of america of America, 106, 19072-10977. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903327106
Maanasa, R., Skoglund, P., Graf, K. E., Metspalu, 1000., Albrechtsen, A., Moltke, I., Rasmussen, S., Stafford Jr., T. W., Orlando, L., Metspalu, Eastward., Karmin, M., Tambets, G., Roots, S., Mägi, R., Campos, P. F., Balanovska, East., Balanovsky, O., Khusnutdinova, E., Litvinov, S., Osipova, L. P., Fedorova, S. A., Voevoda, M. I., DeGiorgio, Thou., Sicheritz-Ponten, T., Brunak, Due south., Demeshchenko, Southward., Kivisild, T., Villems, R., Nielsen, R., Jakobsson, Thousand., & Willerslev, East. (2013). Upper Palaeolithic Siberian Genome Reveals Dual Beginnings of Native Americans. Nature, published online xx November 2013.
Madrigal, Fifty., & Kelly, W. (2006). Human Skin-Color Sexual Dimorphism: A Exam of the Sexual Selection Hypothesis. American Journal of Concrete Anthropology, 132, 470-482. http://dx.doi.org/x.1002/ajpa.20453
Makova, K., & Norton, H. (2005). Worldwide Polymorphism at the MC1R Locus and Normal Pigmentation Variation in Humans. Peptides, 26, 1901-1908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2004.12.032
Manning, A. (1972). An Introduction to Beast Behaviour (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Manning, J. T., Bundred, P. E., & Mather, F. M. (2004). Second to Fourth Digit Ratio, Sexual Selection, and Skin Colour. Evolution and Human being Behavior, 25, 38-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00082-5
Martin, M. K. (1974). The Foraging Accommodation—Uniformity or Diversity? In Addison-Wesley Module in Anthropology, Issue 56, Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Martinez-Cadenas, C., Pena-Chilet, One thousand., Ibarrola-Villava, G., & Ribas, G. (2013). Gender Is a Major Factor Explaining Discrepancies in Eye Colour Prediction Based on HERC2/OCA2 Genotype and the IrisPlex Model. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 7, 453-460. http://dx.doi.org/ten.1016/j.fsigen.2013.03.007
Mather, F., Manning, J. T., & Bundred, P. E. (unpublished) second to 4th Digit Ratio, Hair and Eye Colour in Caucasians: Show for Blond Hair as a Correlate of High Prenatal Oestrogen.
Mazess, R. B. (1967). Pare Color in Bahamian Negroes. Human being Biological science, 39, 145-154.
Meredith, H. 5., & Spurgeon, J. H. (1980). Somatic Comparisons at Age nine Years for Due south Carolina White Girls and Girls of Other Ethnic Groups. Man Biological science, 52, 401-411.
Muggleton, J. (1979). Non-Random Mating in Wild Populations of Polymorphic Adalia Bipunctata. Heredity, 42, 57-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1979.6
Nelson, J. K., & Nelson, K. R. (1986). Skinfold Profiles of Black and White Boys and Girls Ages 11 - xiii. Human Biology, 58, 379-390.
Norton, H. L., & Hammer, Chiliad. F. (2007). Sequence Variation in the Pigmentation Candidate Gene SLC24A5 and Evidence for Independent Evolution of Calorie-free Peel in European and Due east Asian Populations. Program of the 77th Annual Meeting of the American Clan of Physical Anthropologists, 179.
Oakley, Grand. (ed.) (1990). Design Management. A Handbook of Issues and Methods. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Olalde, I., Allentoft, K. East., Sanchez-Quinto, F., Saintpere, G., Chiang, C. W. 1000. et al. (2014). Derived Immune and Ancestral Pigmentation Alleles in a 7000-Twelvemonth-Old Mesolithic European. Nature, early on view.
Olendorf, R., Rodd, F. H., Punzalan, D., Houde, A. E., Hurt, C., Reznick, D. N., & Hughes, K. A. (2006). Frequency-Dependent Survival in Natural Guppy Populations. Nature, 44, 633-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04646
Olivier, G. (1960). Pratique Anthropologique. Paris: Vigot Frères.
Rana, B. K., Hewett-Emmett, D., Jin, L., Chang, B. H. J., Sambuughin, N., Lin, M., Watkins, South., Bamshad, Thousand., Jorde, 50. B., Ramsay, Thou., Jenkins, T., & Li, W. H. (1999). High Polymorphism at the Human Melanocortin i Receptor Locus. Genetics, 151, 1547-1557.
Ray, North., & Adams, J. Grand. (2001). A GIS-Based Vegetation Map of the World at the Last Glacial Maximum (25,000-fifteen,000 BP)-(23rd Millennium to 13th Millennium BC). Internet Archaeology, 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.11141/ia.11.two
Robins, A. H. (1991). Biological Perspectives on Homo Pigmentation. Cambridge: Cambridge Academy Printing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511600463
Russell, R. (2009). A Sex Difference in Facial Pigmentation and Its Exaggeration by Cosmetics. Perception, 38, 1211-1219. http://dx.doi.org/ten.1068/p6331
Russell, R. (2010). Why Cosmetics Work. In R. Adams, Due north. Ambady, Grand. Nakayama, & S. Shimojo (Eds.), The Science of Social Vision (pp. 186-203). New York: Oxford. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333176.003.0011
Schild, R. (1976). The Terminal Paleolithic Settlements of the European Plain. Scientific American, 234, 88-99. http://dx.doi.org/ten.1038/scientificamerican0276-88
Shekar, S. N., Duffy, D. L., Frudakis, T., Montgomery, G. W., James, Chiliad. R., Sturm, R. A., & Martin, N. G. (2008). Spectrophotometric Methods for Quantifying Pigmentation in Human Hair-Influence of MC1R Genotype and Environment. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 84, 719-726. http://dx.doi.org/ten.1111/j.1751-1097.2007.00237.x
Simchuk, A. P. (2001). Frequency-Dependent Sexual Choice in a Natural Population of Oak Leafroller Moth (Tortrix viridana L.). Tsitologiya i Genetika, 35, 25-29.
Sinnock, P. (1970). Frequency Dependence and Mating Behavior in Tribolium castaneum. The American Naturalist, 104, 469-476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/282681
Soejima, M., Tachida, H., Ishida, T., Sano, A., & Koda, Y. (2005). Evidence for Recent Positive Selection at the Homo AIM1 Locus in a European Population. Molecular Biological science & Evolution, 23, 179-188. http://dx.doi.org/x.1093/molbev/msj018
Stansfield, J., & Whitfield, T. W. A. (2005) Can Future Colour Trends Be Predicted on the Basis of Past Color Trends? An Empirical Investigation. Color Research & Application, 30, 235-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/col.20110
Steggerda, Thousand. (1941). Change in Hair Color with Age. Periodical of Heredity, 32, 402-403.
Sturm, R. A., & Frudakis, T. N. (2004). Middle Colour: Portals into Pigmentation Genes and Ancestry. Trends in Genetics, 20, 327-332. http://dx.doi.org/ten.1016/j.tig.2004.06.010
Sturm, R. A., Duffy, D. 50., Zhao, Z. Z., Leite, F. P. Northward., Stark, Thousand. South., Hayward, N. Grand., Martin, N. Chiliad., & Montgomery, G. Due west. (2008). A Single SNP in an Evolutionary Conserved Region inside Intron 86 of the HERC2 Gene Determines Man Blue-Brown Eye Color. American Journal of Human being Genetics, 82, 424-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.eleven.005
Tarr, M. J., Kersten, D., Cheng, Y., & Rossion, B. (2001). It's Pat! Sexing Faces Using Only Red and Green. Journal of Vision, ane, 337.
Templeton, A. R. (2002). Out of Africa Again and Again. Nature, 416, 45-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/416045a
Thelen, T. H. (1983). Minority type Human Mate Preference. Social Biology, xxx, 162-180.
van den Berghe, P. Fifty. (1979). Human Family Systems. An Evolutionary View. New York: Elsevier.
van den Berghe, P. 50., & Frost, P. (1986). Skin Color Preference, Sexual Dimorphism and Sexual Pick: A Case of Gene-Civilization Co-Evolution? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 9, 87-113. http://dx.doi.org/ten.1080/01419870.1986.9993516
Voight, B. F., Kudaravalli, Due south., Wen, X., & Pritchard, J. Thousand. (2006). A Map of Recent Positive Selection in the Human Genome. PLoS Biology, 4, e72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/periodical.pbio.0040072